Array ( [s] => [posts_per_page] => 12 [meta_key] => sb_post_date [order] => DESC [orderby] => meta_value [paged] => 2 [post_type] => Array (  => page  => blog-post  => evidence-review  => feature  => job  => media  => news  => press-release  => project  => report  => summary  => survey  => toolkit  => event ) [tax_query] => Array (  => Array ( [taxonomy] => keywords [field] => slug [terms] => Array (  => biometric-data ) [operator] => IN ) [relation] => AND ) )
13–22 of 22
A meditation on people, technology, place and space
Bringing together 50 members of the UK public to deliberate on the use of biometrics technologies like facial recognition
When the direction of travel is towards more extensive use of biometrics and surveillance, do we need more or less oversight?
A tracker collating developments in policy and practices around vaccine certification and COVID-19 status apps as they emerge around the world
New research evidences accountability, transparency and public participation for trusted use of NHS data
Benefits to patients include things like improving disease detection or developing new medicines and treatments.
Reflections from round one of the Citizens' Biometric Council.
To mark the beginning of an independent review on the governance of biometric data, Ada hosted a debate on UK biometrics regulation
The Ada Lovelace Institute commissions Matthew Ryder QC to lead an independent review of the governance of biometric data.
Facial recognition technology is a complex area, which means the risk of misunderstandings is high.
Professors Clive Bowman and Peter Grindrod CBE on why we need a legal distinction between random and non-random biometrics.