Array ( [s] => [posts_per_page] => 12 [meta_key] => sb_post_date [order] => DESC [orderby] => meta_value [paged] => 2 [post_type] => Array (  => page  => blog-post  => evidence-review  => feature  => job  => media  => news  => press-release  => project  => report  => summary  => survey  => toolkit  => event ) [tax_query] => Array (  => Array ( [taxonomy] => keywords [field] => slug [terms] => Array (  => biometric-technologies ) [operator] => IN ) [relation] => AND ) )
13–24 of 26
Exploring the gaps and risks relating to biometrics in the EU's draft AI regulation
Answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about how we ran the Citizens’ Biometrics Council
Launch event for the final report of the Citizens' Biometrics Council – findings and recommendations
Report with recommendations and findings of a public deliberation on biometrics technology, policy and governance
The Ada Lovelace Institute's Citizens' Biometrics Council concludes that biometric technologies require stronger regulation
A meditation on people, technology, place and space
Bringing together 50 members of the UK public to deliberate on the use of biometrics technologies like facial recognition.
When the direction of travel is towards more extensive use of biometrics and surveillance, do we need more or less oversight?
Reflections from round one of the Citizens' Biometric Council.
To mark the beginning of an independent review on the governance of biometric data, Ada hosted a debate on UK biometrics regulation
The Ada Lovelace Institute commissions Matthew Ryder QC to lead an independent review of the governance of biometric data.
Facial recognition technology is a complex area, which means the risk of misunderstandings is high.