In April 2020, shortly after the start of the first national UK lockdown to contain the COVID-19 virus, the Ada Lovelace Institute convened an expert group to explore the technical considerations and societal implications of using technology to transition from lockdown.
A rapid evidence review published by the Ada Lovelace Institute sets out proposals for whether, and how, the UK Government and NHSX should use data-driven technologies to provide a safe, fair and equitable exit from COVID-19 emergency lockdown measures.
Policy-facing expert groups provide direction for emerging issues that require rapid synthesis, review and response. This method informed Ada’s rapid evidence review of data-driven technologies to provide an exit from COVID-19 emergency lockdown measures – Exit Through the App Store? The report has been influential in informing the policy response:
- Darren Jones MP brought the report as evidence to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, when they considered the implications of proposed contact tracing apps
- The report was referenced in the Biometrics Commissioner’s statement on the use of symptom tracking applications, 21 April 2020
- The Information Commissioner’s Office included the report as evidence in their report on COVID-related technologies
- Carly Kind advised Michael Webb, joint Chief Economic Adviser to the Chancellor and Prime Minister, on algorithmic bias in relation to a proposed new post-COVID-19 digital markets policy initiative, 25 June 2020
- An unofficial Whitehall source reported that the ‘Exit through the App Store’ rapid evidence review and associated summaries were being referenced in internal government strategy documents about T3C (test, track, and trace), and in ministers’ briefing notes, 5 May 2020
- A media source reported that ‘Exit through the App Store’ was referenced in briefing documents presented to SAGE
- Carly Kind joined an international roundtable hosted by CIFAR at the request of Canada’s chief science adviser
- Lord Clement-Jones used the rapid evidence review as supporting evidence for an oral question in the House of Lords, 6 May 2020
- Imogen Parker and Carly Kind were invited to attend a CDEI roundtable with representatives from the Turing and NHSX, to advise on the future of app
- The Ada Lovelace Institute hosted a roundtable under Chatham House rules to convene senior public health, technology, academics and civil society organisations, to discuss technologies in development to support the easing of lockdown measures
- Four organisations made approaches to constitute GATE, the multidisciplinary Group of Advisors on Technology in Emergencies (GATE) proposed in the rapid evidence review, to act as gatekeepers of the deployment of technologies in support of a transition strategy
- Reema Patel formally presented the emerging findings from COVID-19 online deliberation to two meetings – the Silver Data COVID19 network (T2) convened by Government, and the Scottish government’s expert advisory group on engagement and participation in COVID-19, convened by DemSoc and Involve.
- Telegraph: It would be wrong to shrug off the dangerous downsides of a contact tracing app
- Financial Times: Contact-tracing apps must not be used for mass surveillance, warn experts
- Guardian: Digital contact tracing will fail unless privacy is respected, experts warn
- BBC Online: Coronavirus: Why are there doubts over contact-tracing apps?
- British Medical Journal: Covid-19: UK pledges to reintroduce contact tracing to fight virus
- Health Services Journal: Risk of digital contact tracing ‘outweighs value’
- Computer Weekly: Ada Lovelace Institute questions effectiveness of UK contact-tracing strategy
A rapid evidence review of the technical considerations and societal implications of using technology to transition from the first COVID-19 lockdown
Report with recommendations and findings of a public deliberation on biometrics technology, policy and governance
Findings from a rapid expert deliberation to consider the risks and benefits of the potential roll-out of digital vaccine passports
Bringing together 50 members of the UK public to deliberate on the use of biometrics technologies like facial recognition