Search
Browse the Ada Lovelace Institute website.
Filter by:
Active filters:
Emerging approaches to the regulation of biometrics: The EU, the US and the challenge to the UK
What we can learn from international developments in the governance and regulation of biometric technologies
Ada Lovelace Institute curates ‘Ethics & Society’ at CogX 2021
The Ada Lovelace Institute curates a half-day of events at CogX 2021 – the international festival of AI.
What we talk about when we talk about biometrics
The first of a three-part exploration of biometric technologies, looking at how we define biometric data, categorise its uses and conceive of its risk
Containing the canary in the AI coalmine – the EU’s efforts to regulate biometrics
Exploring the gaps and risks relating to biometrics in the EU's draft AI regulation
What is or isn’t OK when it comes to the use of biometric technologies?
Launch event for the final report of the Citizens' Biometrics Council – findings and recommendations
The Citizens’ Biometrics Council
Report with recommendations and findings of a public deliberation on biometrics technology, policy and governance
Public demands stronger regulation for all biometric technologies, the Ada Lovelace Institute finds
The Ada Lovelace Institute's Citizens' Biometrics Council concludes that biometric technologies require stronger regulation
Immunity certificates and public health identity systems
Tracking public and private applications of public health identity systems and collating and monitoring as details emerge into the public domain.
Crowd Clouds
A meditation on people, technology, place and space
Independent legal review of the governance of biometric data in the UK
Matthew Ryder QC is leading an independent legal review of the governance of biometric data, commissioned by the Ada Lovelace Institute
The Citizens’ Biometrics Council
Bringing together 50 members of the UK public to deliberate on the use of biometrics technologies like facial recognition
The Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner: streamlined or eroded oversight?
When the direction of travel is towards more extensive use of biometrics and surveillance, do we need more or less oversight?