Search
Browse the Ada Lovelace Institute website.
Filter by:
Active filters:
An eye on the future
A legal framework for the governance of biometric technologies in the UK
Mass facial recognition roll-out exists in ‘legal grey area’ due to inadequate governance, says the Ada Lovelace Institute
The UK’s approach to governing facial recognition and other biometric technologies is failing to provide legal certainty or safeguard the public.
The data of the most vulnerable people is the least protected
How has biometric data collection caused harm in the context of humanitarian interventions and where do future risks lie?
Trends in biometric information regulation in the USA
What are the precedents, arguments and future prospects for legislation at city to state level?
Independent legal review of the governance of biometric data in England and Wales
An independent legal review of the governance of biometric data, commissioned by the Ada Lovelace Institute and led by Matthew Ryder KC.
The Ryder Review
Independent legal review of the governance of biometric data in England and Wales
Countermeasures
The need for new legislation to govern biometric technologies in the UK
Urgent need for new laws governing biometric technologies, according to an independent legal review
Existing frameworks are inadequate and failing to keep pace, according to an independent legal review led by Matthew Ryder QC.
AI-driven biometry and the infrastructures of everyday life
Normalising the principles of oppression through discriminatory technologies
Emerging approaches to the regulation of biometrics: The EU, the US and the challenge to the UK
What we can learn from international developments in the governance and regulation of biometric technologies
What we talk about when we talk about biometrics
The first of a three-part exploration of biometric technologies, looking at how we define biometric data, categorise its uses and conceive of its risk
How to make a Citizens’ Biometrics Council
Answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about how we ran the Citizens’ Biometrics Council